Reserves squad v Norwooden Spoon
Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2006 9:22 amBradley,Longman,Redden,Thompson,Sutherland,Anderson,L.Button, Wade, Kenney, Percy, Basir, Wood, L.Saunders, R.Saunders, Wallent, Graham, Yoemans, Foster, Burdett.
snoutslouts.org
PREMIERS 1934 / 1973 / 1985 & 1986 BACK TO BACK / 2019 / 2023 & 2024 BACK TO BACK ! SANFLW 2021! Home of the Snouts!
http://forum.snoutslouts.org/
Reserves squad v Norwooden Spoon
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2006 9:22 amPosted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:14 pmL Saunders was wearing no1 last week wasn't he, i got there just at the end of the ressies last week, how did he play????
Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:15 pmSorry just read the other thread, cheers for the info.....
Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:42 pmLee Saunders wore No 53 at the start of the game and No. 59 after 5 minutes into the game. This week he will be wearing number 38. Matt Graham is in number 39 not 30 as that jumper has been misplaced. And since 39 is meant to be Will Bradley's number, but Matt Graham has been wearing it all year, Will Bradley is wearing Number 1.
Don't believe the Budget - I hope we are all confused now.
So, what does a number mean?? Not much to some, but a hell of a lot to others.
I think that Rugby may have the answer in that a number signifies a position, but that makes it really hard for the versatile players who can play forward or back* and those changing off the ball, through the forward pocket and rotating off the bench.
Don't believe the Budget - I hope we are all confused now.
So, what does a number mean?? Not much to some, but a hell of a lot to others.
I think that Rugby may have the answer in that a number signifies a position, but that makes it really hard for the versatile players who can play forward or back* and those changing off the ball, through the forward pocket and rotating off the bench.
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 10:20 amGoes to show that 1 quarter of footy does not a winning team make - although we came very close.
Welcome to the Club Lee Saunders, what a fantastic, gutsy game. No wonder he never fitted in at South, he actually tries.
Lucas Block and Marcus Burdett were back to their blistering best and Wadey was great in the 2nd half down back. Must have been something about backmen in 2nd halves, obviously set up Forest's great effort.
Unfortunately, spent a lot of time chasing and not getting, but, Norwood did have 8 blokes over 6'4", so that stretched us a bit. And Cox, No 37, was virtually untouchable for Norwood.
I cannot believe that Jamie Vlatko is not good enough to get into the League team after what I saw yesterday, especially when you consider that David Yeomans is good enough.
Welcome to the Club Lee Saunders, what a fantastic, gutsy game. No wonder he never fitted in at South, he actually tries.
Lucas Block and Marcus Burdett were back to their blistering best and Wadey was great in the 2nd half down back. Must have been something about backmen in 2nd halves, obviously set up Forest's great effort.
Unfortunately, spent a lot of time chasing and not getting, but, Norwood did have 8 blokes over 6'4", so that stretched us a bit. And Cox, No 37, was virtually untouchable for Norwood.
I cannot believe that Jamie Vlatko is not good enough to get into the League team after what I saw yesterday, especially when you consider that David Yeomans is good enough.
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 11:23 amMaxyoz wrote:I cannot believe that Jamie Vlatko is not good enough to get into the League team after what I saw yesterday, especially when you consider that David Yeomans is good enough.
madcap (milkdrinker) muttered the same thing to me early in the seniors match.
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 2:00 pmPseudo wrote:Maxyoz wrote:I cannot believe that Jamie Vlatko is not good enough to get into the League team after what I saw yesterday, especially when you consider that David Yeomans is good enough.
madcap (milkdrinker) muttered the same thing to me early in the seniors match.
I think all Norwood supporters feel the same way
