snoutslouts.org

I'm guessing there wasn't room for Bradley, Vallance and Longman! (unless one of them is the second Wallent)
Plant is the other out - probably because of his shoulder.

Definitely would be up there in the race for the best Reserves team since.................(1992 GF?)

There's only eighteen (different) names on this list; is there a larger League squad named, or just afew names missing?

And I thought Braddles was injured still?

23 named in the League, so presumably 2 of them will come back to the Reserves (that's what happened last week)

Thought I saw Wil got in the best for Brighton last week- can anyone confirm?

Well according to the (often unreliable) Weekend Word which just got emailed out, 22 players were named in the Reserves - with the 4 extras being Vallance, Bradley, Longman and Tutt.

League side was as named in the paper, so if two get dropped back to the Reserves, 3 of the Reserves squad will have to find somewhere else to play this week.

the losing grand final team of 2005 would at least be on a par or maybe better, really hard to say.

a reliable source tells me that braddles got best for brighton last week and is fit but due to the rather low injury list (or lack of) there are a few players missing out this week

What happens to our players if league/ ressies full and player over 19? Is there a prefered club Glenelg makes them play for or do they go back to original club (S-E??)

They are farmed out to local clubs.


Also school footy has finished now, so all the college boys are back and available for the younger grades as well.

most play for glenelg affiliated clubs like brighton marion phos camden etc. but they are all in finals now so unless played 4 games for that club this season they cant play anywhere.

another win to the ressies

missed the first half

15 pts up at half time despite having 10 more scoring shots

Reserves ended up winning by about 10 goals.

Norwood reserves lost, meaning the Bays have secured top spot on the ladder!

+ Congratulations on 10 wins in a row.

May not get as many people on the b grade bus though this year, there is another bigger bus gathering steam as well!

Rushby Hinds wrote:Reserves ended up winning by about 10 goals.

No, 13 goals

Norwood reserves lost, meaning the Bays have secured top spot on the ladder!

No, Norwood can still get top spot back if they thrash South next week and the Eagles thrash us.

+ Congratulations on 10 wins in a row.

No, 9 wins in a row.
Do you work for the Advertiser or something, Rushby

Ecky wrote:

Rushby Hinds wrote:Reserves ended up winning by about 10 goals.

No, 13 goals

Norwood reserves lost, meaning the Bays have secured top spot on the ladder!

No, Norwood can still get top spot back if they thrash South next week and the Eagles thrash us.

+ Congratulations on 10 wins in a row.

No, 9 wins in a row.
Do you work for the Advertiser or something, Rushby

Struth, you'd better email the magoos coach tomorrow, because at the presso's Gods announced it was their tenth win in a row!

(and would you believe me if he said they won by about 10 goals and can't lose top spot)