snoutslouts.org

Has anyone got the stats from this game?

magicsd wrote:Has anyone got the stats from this game?

MayZ does...

due to popular demand

player..kicks, hballs, marks

adlington 8 6 4
basir 4 3 1
carey 9 8 8
curnow 17 18 11
day 11 10 5
fosdike 8 5 2
graham 21 16 16
grosser 5 1 4
guilhaus 4 10 8
horan 13 4 2
kane 8 10 4
kellock 5 6 2
lewis 7 7 3
liebelt 7 8 3
mcconnell 22 10 9
plant 7 12 2
robinson 9 4 5
sellar 13 4 8
sugars 12 5 4
vallance 13 11 5
wallent 9 9 7

MAY-Z wrote:due to popular demand

player..kicks, hballs, marks

adlington 8 6 4
basir 4 3 1
carey 9 8 8
curnow 17 18 11
day 11 10 5
fosdike 8 5 2
graham 21 16 16
grosser 5 1 4
guilhaus 4 10 8
horan 13 4 2
kane 8 10 4
kellock 5 6 2
lewis 7 7 3
liebelt 7 8 3
mcconnell 22 10 9
plant 7 12 2
robinson 9 4 5
sellar 13 4 8
sugars 12 5 4
vallance 13 11 5
wallent 9 9 7

I like Eckys format better in order of most stats to least....

MAY-Z wrote:due to popular demand

player..kicks, hballs, marks

adlington 8 6 4
basir 4 3 1
carey 9 8 8
curnow 17 18 11

Formatting is terrible, May-Z, plus, Ecky ranks them in possession order, not alphabetically.

Shambles.

Ecky, stop taking days off.

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:

MAY-Z wrote:due to popular demand

player..kicks, hballs, marks

adlington 8 6 4
basir 4 3 1
carey 9 8 8
curnow 17 18 11
day 11 10 5
fosdike 8 5 2
graham 21 16 16
grosser 5 1 4
guilhaus 4 10 8
horan 13 4 2
kane 8 10 4
kellock 5 6 2
lewis 7 7 3
liebelt 7 8 3
mcconnell 22 10 9
plant 7 12 2
robinson 9 4 5
sellar 13 4 8
sugars 12 5 4
vallance 13 11 5
wallent 9 9 7

I like Eckys format better in order of most stats to least....

i prefer alpahbetical then you can look for someones stats easier, plus if people want to see who had the most it forces them to look through the entire list therefore exposing more stats to more people

MAY-Z wrote:i prefer alpahbetical then you can look for someones stats easier, plus if people want to see who had the most it forces them to look through the entire list therefore exposing more stats to more people

Incorrect - it is hard enough to get people to read stats at the best of times, let alone when they are formatted/sorted in such a shambolic way. It just makes people ignore them.

We should have a poll - do you read the stats more closely when they are formatted in Ecky's way, or MayZ's way?

Ecky wrote:

MAY-Z wrote:i prefer alpahbetical then you can look for someones stats easier, plus if people want to see who had the most it forces them to look through the entire list therefore exposing more stats to more people

Incorrect - it is hard enough to get people to read stats at the best of times, let alone when they are formatted/sorted in such a shambolic way. It just makes people ignore them.

We should have a poll - do you read the stats more closely when they are formatted in Ecky's way, or MayZ's way?

if people care they will read them, if they dont they wont - simple

just like if people cared about the reserves they would actually be at the games

sjabc wrote:If the Sebatron looks at this thread, or any known associate of the Sebatron, can
you please explain WTF the hand signal was in the last quarter ?

....

the Sebatron says:

The hand signal (rotating an open palm over your other hand which is cupped) denotes...

"Squashing them like bugs"

LOL....How funny was that when the question was put forward to him re the gesture...

"Squash 'em like bugs"...ha ha...way to go Seb. Hey ET who was the player behind big Sebby when the
question was posed ? Micky Liebelt ? I Can't recall, but I can recall the player, having a bit of a chuckle
about it too...

sjabc wrote:LOL....How funny was that when the question was put forward to him re the gesture...

"Squash 'em like bugs"...ha ha...way to go Seb. Hey ET who was the player behind big Sebby when the
question was posed ? Micky Liebelt ? I Can't recall, but I can recall the player, having a bit of a chuckle
about it too...

Yep...

I don't think that Mick could believe that Seb actually took the time to think about a signature move.........