snoutslouts.org

Reserves
F: Stark, Harrap, McCurry
HF: Hutchesson, Hinge, Whaley
C: Newton, Laba, Gamble
HB: Woodall, Edwards, Kennedy
B: McIntyre, Brooks, VanGils

R: Hill, Chalmers, Saunders
INT: Donkersley

Under-18
F: Hindmarsh, Rosenzweig, McLeod
HF: Boyle, Kitschke, Angley
C: Evans, Tate, Johnsson
HB: Walters, Chant, Williams
B: Salt, Kipping, Trembath

R: Sullivan, McPherson, Gordon
INT: Soper, Kusterman, Pidgeon, Dinnison, COCKS

Is Underwood injured?

We had 13 Under 18 players in the reserves today, and a very young side in the 18's as well (and it showed)

Reserves


Norwood 9 16 70
Glenelg 2 6 18

GLENELG
Goal Kickers: N. Stark , D. Hill
Best Players: J. Laba, T. Saunders, B. Van Gils, E. Chalmers, N. Brooks, J. Redden



Under 18's

Norwood 15 12 102
Glenelg 4 5 29

GLENELG

Goal Kickers: J. Salt , B. Tate , D. Angley , L. Kustermann
Best Players: B. Trembath, R. Chant, J. Boyle, H. Walters, B. Williams, T. Sullivan


Brody Trembath (best player) was playing his first 18's match (is from our u16s)

Easy Tiger! wrote:We had 13 Under 18 players in the reserves today, and a very young side in the 18's as well (and it showed)

Reserves


Norwood 9 16 70
Glenelg 2 6 18






Under 18's

Norwood 15 12 102
Glenelg 4 5 29

GLENELG

Goal Kickers: J. Salt , B. Tate , D. Angley , L. Kustermann
Best Players: B. Trembath, R. Chant, J. Boyle, H. Walters, B. Williams, T. Sullivan


Brody Trembath (best player) was playing his first 18's match (is from our u16s)

Don't care. Who's fault is that? Is it injuries, fitness, lack of ability, poor recruitment/ depth?

Get the list right in December and things are easier in June.

Depth? Didn't we have 70 odd at senior pre-season (not including u18's)? The same preseason that was supposedly the best in a long time with aggressive recruiting, a focus on foot skills and a much improved fitness base? Yes we have injuries but surely questions need to be asked!

[quote="Easy Tiger!"]We had 13 Under 18 players in the reserves today, and a very young side in the 18's as well (and it showed)

13? 6 of them are actually u18's! Some others have played in the 18's as overagers but to say we had 13 u 18's playing is ridiculous!

Mutley wrote:

Easy Tiger! wrote:We had 13 Under 18 players in the reserves today, and a very young side in the 18's as well (and it showed)

13? 6 of them are actually u18's! Some others have played in the 18's as overagers but to say we had 13 u 18's playing is ridiculous!

OK, so we had 13 players eligible to play u18 this year play in the reserves. I didn't specifically mean people age 17 or younger.

Pretty impressive that we have lost our last 4 games and are still sitting third.

Depending on how much the Ressies lose by, we could still get another week or two in the Top Five.